Comparison of percutaneous and open repair of Achilles tendon rupture: results and complications from a single institution.

BACKGROUND: The Achilles tendon is the strongest tendon in the human body, but it is prone to injury, especially in modern times when recreational sports are growing in popularity. As a result, Achilles tendon rupture is becoming an increasingly common medical problem in modern society. The main objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of percutaneous repair and open repair for the treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted involving a total of 316 patients who had undergone surgical treatment for Achilles tendon rupture between 2013 and 2021. The data collected from the medical history of these patients included the type of surgical procedure, the mechanism of injury, the age and sex of the patients, the time spent in the hospital, and any possible complications of the surgical treatment (such as infections, reruptures, or sural nerve injuries). RESULTS: The study revealed that there was no significant difference between percutaneous and open surgical approaches in terms of sural nerve injury. However, there was a statistically significant advantage of the percutaneous method in terms of the number of infections, which was significantly lower than that of the open method. Additionally, the median length of hospital stay was found to be four days longer with the open approach. However, the study noted that a statistically significant advantage of the percutaneous method for rerupture could not be established due to the small number of patients with rerupture and the insufficient ratio of patients with rerupture in relation to the size of the observed population. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous repair is an effective treatment option for Achilles tendon rupture and has outcomes equal to or better than those of open repair. Therefore, this approach is recommended as the preferred method of treatment due to the presence of fewer complications, provided that the indications for this technique are appropriate.

Novel screw fixation placement configuration for the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis.

Verticality of transcervical hip fractures in young patients is usually connected with typically high-energy fractures which are known as Pauwels type III. Artificial femoral head replacement surgery is mostly not considered for treating femoral neck fractures in such patients. The commonly used devices for the fixation of vertical femoral neck fractures are multiple screws or a sliding hip screw with or without an antirotation screw. Size, location and length of the screws are the most effective parameters in terms of the structural performance of internal fixation implants, but the optimal configuration of the screws is necessary to be investigated to direct the clinical practice. The aim of this study is to compare the biomechanical stability of the standard inverted triangle configuration with the various newly proposed x-crossed screw configurations. FEA simulations carried out in this study demonstrated that using an x-crossed-right assembly in treating Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures satisfies the biomechanical stability in terms of maximum von Mises stresses and maximum femoral head displacement. However, in terms of maximum relative neck fracture displacement, the x-crossed-right assembly would not entirely suffice the desired biomechanical stability. Therefore, using an x-crossed screw assembly in treating femoral neck fractures would provide the needed biomechanical stability.

Comparison between external locking plate fixation and conventional external fixation for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures: a finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: Good clinical outcomes for locking plates as an external fixator to treat tibial fractures have been reported. However, external locking plate fixation is still generally rarely performed. This study aimed to compare the stability of an external locking plate fixator with that of a conventional external fixator for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures using finite element analysis. METHODS: Three models were constructed: (1) external locking plate fixation of proximal tibial fracture with lateral proximal tibial locking plate and 5-mm screws (ELP), (2) conventional external fixation of proximal tibial fracture with an 11-mm rod and 5-mm Schanz screws (EF-11), and (3) conventional external fixation of a proximal tibial fracture with a 7-mm rod and 5-mm Schanz screws (EF-7). The stress distribution, displacement at the fracture gap, and stiffness of the three finite element models at 30-, 40-, 50-, and 60-mm plate-rod offsets from the lateral surface of the lateral condyle of the tibia were determined. RESULTS: The conventional external fixator showed higher stiffness than the external locking plate fixator. In all models, the stiffness decreased as the distance of the plate-rod from the bone surface increased. The maximum stiffness was 121.06 N/mm in the EF-11 model with 30-mm tibia-rod offset. In the EF-7 model group, the maximum stiffness was 40.00 N/mm in the model with 30-mm tibia-rod offset. In the ELP model group, the maximum stiffness was 35.79 N/mm in the model with 30-mm tibia-plate offset. CONCLUSIONS: Finite element analysis indicated that external locking plate fixation is more flexible than conventional external fixation and can influence secondary bone healing. External locking plate fixation requires the placement of the plate as close as possible to the skin, which allows for a low-profile design because the increased distance from the plate to the bone can be too flexible for bone healing. Further experimental mechanical model tests are necessary to validate these finite element models, and further biological analysis is necessary to evaluate the effect of external locking plate fixation on fracture healing.

Surgical treatment of scapular fractures: Results and complications.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to describe a surgical technique and report on patient-based functional outcomes and complications following open reduction and internal fixation in patients with scapular fractures. METHODS: The study comprised 14 patients who were treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of a scapular fractures between September 2010 and July 2018. Surgical indications were as follows: medial/lateral displacement greater than 20 mm; shortening greater than 25 mm; angular deformity greater than 40°; intra-articular step-off greater than 4 mm; and double shoulder suspensory injuries (including fracture of the clavicle, coracoid or acromion with displacement greater than 10 mm). All patients underwent X-ray examination (true AP, Y scapular view) and computed tomography (CT) scans. Fractures were classified according to the revised (AO/OTA) classification system. Functional outcomes were measured using Constant-Murley scores. RESULTS: Seven patients had glenoid fossa fractures, six patients had scapular body fractures and one patient had an acromion process fracture. All glenoid fossa and scapular body fractures were exposed via the Judet approach. Eleven of 14 patients were given Constant-Murley scores at the final follow-up examination; three patients were lost to follow-up. The mean follow-up after injury was 44 months (range, 6-92 months). We found infraspinatus muscle hypotrophy in four patients. The mean Constant-Murley score was 93.45 (±8.93) for the injured arm and 98.36 (±2.91) for the uninjured arm. The mean score between the injured and uninjured arm was 4.91(±6.49), which is an excellent functional outcome according to the Constant-Murley score. CONCLUSIONS: Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced scapular fractures is a safe and effective treatment option that results in a reliable union rate and good-to-excellent functional outcome.

Intramedullary nailing of adult forearm fractures: Results and complications.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of adult forearm fractures treated with interlocking intramedullary nailing. METHODS: This retrospective study included 21 patients who were treated with intramedullary interlocking nailing for forearm fractures between January 2010 and September 2017. All patients were treated with intramedullary forearm nails designed to allow interfragmentary compression. The medical records and radiographs of all patients were evaluated. Fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA classification system by analyzing the radiographs. Union time, union rate, clinical outcome, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Primary intramedullary osteosynthesis was performed in 17 patients with forearm shaft fractures. The average union time was 10 weeks (range, 8-16 weeks) in the primary osteosynthesis cohort. Secondary intramedullary osteosynthesis was performed in four patients following the removal of plates and screws due to nonunions. For this group of patients, bone union took an average of 17 weeks (range 8-24 weeks). The overall union rate was 95.24% in the 21 forearm fractures which were treated with an intramedullary interlocking nail with a compression screw that allows interfragmentary compression to be obtained. Overall complications included one nonunion, one postoperative rupture of the extensor pollicis longus tendon, and 1 postoperative transitory radial nerve palsy. CONCLUSIONS: Intramedullary interlocking nailing with a compression screw is an alternative method of fixation for treating adult forearm fractures and provides good clinical outcomes with reliable union rates.

THE CROATIAN HEALTH INSURANCE FUND DOES NOT RECOGNIZE DIFFERENCES IN THE COST OF DIFFERENT TREATMENTS FOR REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY.

In recent years, there has been increased interest in the cost of treatment for revision interventions for hip and knee prostheses. In all publications so far, the authors note the high cost of treatment for revision interventions, especially if infection is present. The aim of this study was to compare the cost of treatment and health insurance reimbursements between revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for infection and revision for aseptic indications (aseptic instability and periprosthetic fracture). Hospital data on 168 patients having undergone revision THA between 2010 and 2018 at the Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre from Zagreb were analyzed. Financial data were collected from the Hospital Information System. Financial analysis included total cost per patient, Croatian Health Insurance Fund reimbursements, cost of implants, and length of hospital stay. The difference between the mean total cost per patient and the mean Croatian Health Insurance Fund reimbursements was -262.83 € (-6.08%) for aseptic instability, -1694.94 € (-17.25%) for infection and -916.49 € (-17.33%) for periprosthetic fracture. The Croatian Health Insurance Fund does not recognize differences in the cost of revision THA for aseptic instability, infection and periprosthetic fracture. Health insurance reimbursement is inadequate for centers that offer revision hip surgery.

TREATMENT OF HUMERAL SHAFT FRACTURES: ANTEGRADE INTERLOCKING INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING WITH ADDITIONAL INTERLOCKING NEUTRALIZATION SCREWS THROUGH FRACTURE SITE.

The aim of this study was to compare union time between two different nail designs for the treatment of humeral shaft fracture, i.e. antegrade interlocking intramedullary nail with and without additional interlocking neutralization screws. The retrospective study included 51 patients treated with antegrade humeral intramedullary nailing between January 2015 and December 2017. The inclusion criteria of the study were proximal and middle third humeral shaft fractures. Fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria; 23 patients were treated with antegrade intramedullary nail with additional interlocking neutralization screws through fracture site (group A) and 28 patients were treated with antegrade intramedullary nail without additional interlocking neutralization screws (group B). Medical documentation and radiographic images taken preoperatively and postoperatively were reviewed. Radiological union was defined as cortical bridging of at least three of four cortices in two-plane radiographs, with disappearance of the fracture gap. There were no significant differences in union time between the groups (p>0.05). To our knowledge, this is the first report of antegrade interlocking humeral nailing with additional interlocking neutralization screws through fracture site. Hypothetical advantages of fracture gap reduction by additional interlocking neutralization screws to promote union were not confirmed by this first clinical trial.